Hacker News Reader

Notably:

> In these interviews, Weinstein laments that the scientific community is dismissive of GU because he has not released a technical paper, but insists that scientists should be able to understand the substantive content of GU from the lecture alone

This is alarm bells territory. There's nothing there.

View on HN

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

Baez should update this list to include: 20 points for publishing your theory only on YouTube.

23 years old typo in point 8: "Einstien"

That's not a typo.

Why not? The author demonstrated that he could write the name correctly otherwise in the text.

All the names in point 8 are misspelled, that’s the point.

Ok, I see; obviously not my kind of humor.

You actually almost fit point 20 now:

> 20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot index. (E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers" or saying that I misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)

Still waiting for my 20 points.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com