More technical rebuttal is here http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-post-problems...
> In these interviews, Weinstein laments that the scientific community is dismissive of GU because he has not released a technical paper, but insists that scientists should be able to understand the substantive content of GU from the lecture alone
This is alarm bells territory. There's nothing there.
Baez should update this list to include: 20 points for publishing your theory only on YouTube.
> 20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot index. (E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers" or saying that I misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)