Sawyer X's paradox is that he's the soldier-diplomat that walked into the Perl 5 to Perl 7 warzone to try to fight (t)his battle (Perl 7, cruftness) and at the same time defuse the conflict. He even admits to being "offensive to some" in his OP. He's a bold person, fierce in his beliefs and in his choice of words, not a victim. And so his boldness and passion has taken him to being scolded in every possible way, from personal to technical, toxic to civilized, and sometimes he fought hard, even on a personal level and finally gave up.

Here's a few comments from a thread allegedly savaged from Twitter [1]:

> So no choosing which Perl runs for /usr/bin/perl7 and which Perl /usr/bin/perl or and which is /usr/bin/perl like with some other languages? Will I be able to use 7's features without 'use v7' if I do name the executable 'perl7'? Does using 'use v7'm mean keeping all the cruft?

> Depends on what you mean by cruft

> The people actually doing work on perl core don't seem to find the 'cruft' problematic and if they do we can rip out stuff after a deprecation period like normal, so unless/until somebody who knows the core code objects I consider that an imaginary problem.

> yeah, i tried to point this out below as well think it should be mentioned that the email linked is from nicholas clark, so there's 3 core maintainers who hold that the important of cruft in perl code is in doubt

As one can see, the word "cruft" had actually become central to the discussion, even used with apostrophes - a sign that it hit a nerve somewhere? Maybe a better choice of words and overall tact would have been better in managing egos left and right.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26779586