I’d start with the ones that are clearly doing irreversible harm. Think of a coal burning plant to produce electricity or deforestation of hundreds of acres in the Amazon to build more IKEA furniture.
Likewise, the Amazon can be reforested. Maybe not at the rate were cutting it down, but it's not as though trees will never be able to grow there again.
There needs to be a more nuanced decision around these. I'm with you, those things are bad and they should stop, but I would prefer to have a coherent framework we decide based on. I don't want to arbitrarily decide based on who can sway public opinion.