The car companies did this across the board to their entire supply chain.
In fact, I know some folks who relied on that business and had to close up shop because they basically had machines they bought specifically for auto manufacturers and they cancelled ALL their orders at the same time, with no ETA on when they would place the orders again.
They knew there was a pandemic, they knew the supply chain would be wonky and they just assumed it would start back up without delay when they were ready to make cars. They pushed the risk to their suppliers and when they went to place orders and everyone else had booked their capacity, laid off the employees or suppliers went out of business they were like "OMG HOW DID THIS HAPPEN!?".
Talking to some of the people I know, this is an unmitigated disaster that is entirely the auto manufacturers fault. There should be no sympathy for these idiots.
Definition of “lie”:
> A lie is an assertion that is believed to be false, typically used with the purpose of deceiving someone
The car industry fucked up a forecast and cancelled based on their forecast. That’s not a lie.
Even if what you wrote is true - it's just the market at work. If the car companies can pay enough to get slots in a fab and beat out smaller players so be it.
The demand for semiconductors currently exceeds supply. This means there will be shortages, price increases etc, until further capacity can be brought online or demand is lowered.
I don't think there's any "bad guys" here.
Prices, and the willingness to tolerate an increase in them, is the ultimate signal of what people actually consider important, as opposed to just 'empty words' claims of importance.
Seems like the demand increase and supply disruption would explain a lot of it.
But what happened instead was everyone changed their plans for all of 2020/2021 and cancelled like all their orders. So everyone downstream handles that by shutting stuff down, firing people, etc. But 3 months later everyone shows back up and is like "oh wait no actually give us the normal production back". Meanwhile all your laid off staff is just working elsewhere.
I'm also a layman, but my feeling has been that the "stop everything! no wait start everything back up" has been way more of an issue than the actual production stoppage (which only was a couple of months! Remember how everyone was dragged back into work a couple months into the pandemic?)
I'm sure I'm extremely simplifying things here though and might be outright wrong though.
It wouldn't work like that because demand increased and supply decreased at the same time creating a backlog that one would expect to last longer than the period of decreased supply.
Let's make up some numbers to show this. Imagine normal supply and demand is for 100 units per month. The pandemic hits and supply is now at 0, 25, and 50 for the next three months before returning to normal. Meanwhile demand goes to 75, 100, and then sticks at an elevated demand of 125. In those three months, the industry has produced 75 units, but the market needed 300 units creating a built up demand for an additional 225 units that doesn't simply go away. That backlog can never be satisficed as long as demand stays elevated and supply is normal. The suppliers actually have to increase production beyond both normal demand and current demand. Maybe they are able to adjust and produce 150 units per month starting in month four. That gives them a surplus of 25 units a month which means it is still another 9 months before all the built up demand is satisfied. It would therefore take a full year before the impact of that 3 month disruption dissipates.
That is obviously a rudimentary example, but it shows how a combination of decreased supply and increased demand can cause issues that last longer than the change on either side of the market.
The other issue is the "car industry" doesn't order from fab. They order from a supplier of a module, who orders from a chip designer, who orders from a fab. And that's probably not accurate either as it leaves out plenty of middlemen.