As you said:

> This is Destiny saying that if it takes someone committing mass murder to stop property damage, it is justified. There's no two ways about it.

“If [...], then justified” is an ethical statement — and as you say, there’s no two ways about interpreting it.

You simply lack the intellectual honesty to admit your own summary of the statement plainly shows it’s an ethical statement, not an incitement to violence.

You disagree with the statement, so you’re making emotional, inconsistent arguments to try discrediting it.

The only person “weaseling” is you — who are contradicting yourself and refusing to address my points.