Hacker News Reader

At least C is a complete language and a solid building block which is possible to reason about, compared to C++ which is becoming more and more bloated in a modernization attempt, so C++ projects need to be constantly updated and rewritten to catch up, which rarely happens in practise. On the other end, C++ can hardly adopt things like memory model based on Rust's borrow checker, so in this regard C++ is a dead end.

View on HN

In my mind, C++ is one of the only languages that is evolving with the times.

They don’t add features that break backward compatibility, or features that sacrifice runtime performance especially if you don’t use those features. Most new features added to C++ are actually just additions to the STL, which you aren’t forced to use.

It is an open standard, so there is plentiful competition in the realm of compilers. Rust only has 1 so you are SOL if you don’t like something or if the project goes bust one day.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com