I know, I thought the same thing. All that work, citations of research done after the writing of the book, and some how still misunderstood the points made by the author.

Curious also why this isn’t published in a journal, and be peer refereed... or has it? That is the standard required for a “takedown”.

Edit: Or at least allow a right of reply from the author. Having just read the book you have intentionally misrepresented a number of (perhaps even all) points. I can only think you are trying to generate controversy to build your own profile.