Typical HN/SV response when it comes to Bitcoin. I'll give anyone on here $1000 in BTC/USD/ETH if they document how to run a full node on Ethereum before May 2021. It's impossible to do without state of the art tech and bandwidth.
Bitcoin on the other hand, can be run on a Raspberry Pi, and people can agree on how many Bitcoin exist at ANY time.
How many Ethereum exist right now? Pro tip: Nobobdy can agree
Not gonna make it... also if you looked into the costs it would lose you money if you took me up on that bet.
I have a better idea: Stacks sats and stay humble.
Prove it
> I'm still glad to take your $1,000 if you'd like a full tutorial
Post your tutorial on twitter on how to run a full node from scratch, using your own hardware, and I'll give you $1000 to buy some NFT's
I don't see why running a full node is such a huge problem. Do you think this means ETH will somehow fail to scale? Seems like the team could solve this eventually, while Bitcoin team hasn't solved anything for a long time.
Look up #SupplyGate on Twitter
> I don't see why running a full node is such a huge problem.
Of course you don't lol
> Do you think this means ETH will somehow fail to scale?
Yes
> Seems like the team could solve this eventually
"Eventually" .... Yeah move fast and break things typical SV logic
> Bitcoin team hasn't solved anything for a long time
Scoreboard
#supplygate seems to be a bitcoin-eth debate. I think bitcoin is a dead project, in terms of innovation.
Explain then - what's the issue with lack of full nodes?
How will ETH fail to scale, and why wont a competitor like Algorand or Tezos pick up the mantle?