No claim was ever made that they are 100% effective. Vaccines are not 100% effective either, this does not mean they are ineffective.
> Could still be coincide with something else. Even if it covid that caused that, still need to how how prevalent this is.
Willfully ignorant.
> The lockdown also corelates with the start of the pandemic, how do u know its not caused by the lockdown ?
Because lifting restrictions is directly related to increases in cases, which is then directly correlated to the number of deaths? Willfully ignorant.
> I'm not blindly against lockdown, I'm againts lockdown because it doesn't make sense. It caused problem greater than the virus itself
We might agree that there may be more effective ways to keep people separated than a full blown lockdown, balancing health concerns with people's needs, but at the time, it was the best tool in the toolbox- and outside the US worked well- New Zealand, for example, which is pretty much back to normal these days after a duration much closer to the first time period.
As for your last statement, you are certainly implying that your own inconvenience is far more damaging than the lives of others. You don't want to wear a mask, you won't stay home, you... just want to let the people die and let the chips fall where they may. All the while claiming that lockdowns are ineffective while in your other posts admitting you didn't follow them [1][2]. "The thing doesn't work even though I didn't do it and I am fully aware it requires everyone's compliance to be effective." Sounds like you are ready to run for office as a Republican.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23817123 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24191298