Still argues for removing RMS, using a creative 'baity' title.
Part of the general effort to get RMS removed, flagged for being part of a seemingly concerted PR campaign, nothing new here.
Part of the general effort to get RMS removed, flagged for being part of a seemingly concerted PR campaign, nothing new here.
I see it as not spam; it’s a timely post about why a senior member of the open source community is not suitable for a leadership position that they have just taken up.
No, it's not. My thoughts are my own. I wrote it after reading through various discussions and feeling a more nuanced take was generally lacking and felt I had something to add to the conversation. Nothing more, nothing less.