You overestimate how your lifestyle isn’t representative of the world.
I’m not diminishing their impact (although I question lots of their business practices). But it’s not the most important tech, by a huge huge margin.
Privacy is not the only concern, phones are massively used (about a 50% of population) and we all use them for all kinds of purposes - and that part is also growing.
Not to have an open-source option for someting this widespread is not a good idea by my opinion.
> People on this site like overestimate the avg. persons concern with ....
The "average person" concerns come from "average" understanding of the subject. Average person didn't even need a smartphone 20 or 30 years ago - SF toys :)
EDIT: subjective yea, but come on dude people being able to eat is more important than google not knowing what type of porn I like.
I'm also not sure how Doordash is supposed to help at all for people who were already eating significant amounts of fast food.
Either way, all you're really doing with Doordash is passing the risk of transmission off to someone else. Ideally the delivery person has a better immune system than you (and refrains from making contacting those with weaker immune systems), but that whittles down the demographic of those who seriously benefit from Doordash even further.
Also, the PinePhone project is poised to bring serious repairability, privacy, and security options to a device category many now consider to be essential. It's not so trivial as preventing Google from accessing up your search results.
Regardless, we're comparing potential mortality to potential rights violations. If anyone can figure out how to objectively compare the value of human lives to human rights, give me a call.