White isn’t a culture. Also BIPOC have made contributions to all those things. Way to erase them.
The wright brothers, carl benz, charles babbage, invented flight, automobiles, and computers respectively.
All very white dudes.
"Asian" is too broad a term to be much use outside of geography.
"Latin" is a little more coherent, based on both geography and language. It's still pretty broad though; there are common threads but I don't know anyone who identifies simply as Latin.
"White" as a cultural identity is a relatively new invention. Personally I don't see much in the way of a shared culture here. It's problematic for many because in the USA it's been very prominently used by persons and groups who've been opposed to increasing civil rights for non-whites. It's distasteful to others because it represents a flattening of culture -- in my experience, white Americans will generally more readily identify with a particular subset of European heritage and/or with their own state or region. But this may be changing.
There's no bald people culture.
Or innie bellybutton culture.
If we enslaved people based on their baldness for a few centuries and then kept discriminating against them for another century, I am sure they would have their own culture born from that shared experience.
Southern Black people were the only ones in America that did.
Then if you expand that definition globally...the number of total black people experiencing slavery from white people during that time, was actually the very small.
It's like saying all White People share a culture because the Irish had a hard time during British or American repression.
Your using one definition to support your argument but then saying that definition also doesn't apply to other groups.
FJ Haydn spent the bulk of his working career in Hungary, toward the end of his career he went to France and England and received large adoring audiences, not as some kind of exoticism, but because he was/is a giant of European/white culture.
Why would anyone say “white isn't a culture” except to express animosity towards white people?
Arch, Debian, Suse, etc. are cultures, but gnu/Linux isn't?
I truly believe the word "white" does not, in practice, describe a specific culture, or even a specific set of closely related cultures, and I have no animosity toward white people. I don't think that opinion comes anywhere near the "almost exclusively held by racists" category.