Your goal of bringing healthy food more cheaply to people is great, but based on the other advantages this tech has, I think the price should be much closer. Eg if chipotle is selling it for $10, yours should be $8 or $9 not $5.
Your goal of bringing healthy food more cheaply to people is great, but based on the other advantages this tech has, I think the price should be much closer. Eg if chipotle is selling it for $10, yours should be $8 or $9 not $5.
If you hit about $6-7 a meal, you'll be very close to competing with home-cooked meals on cost. Sure people can go a bit cheaper, but it isn't gonna be really a significant reduction, but there will be a large time cost to it for home-cooked.
I am rooting for you. :)
Yeah for our broke selves the goal has been to basically get the price point down to the point where it's a no-brainer to skip cooking.
The problem was taste. At some point he was getting literally depressed. I told him to do 1 normal meal once a day, and his mood improved.
Taste is important. Variety is the spice of life.
Not if you value your time. Cooking raw beans can easily take 45 minutes.
Plus, I don't get the fascination of cooking "single" portions the last decade. The amount of time it takes to cook one portion of nearly everything, you can knock out 4-8 in the same 30-40 min time span. Leftovers next day, lunch or freeze it for a little while. You spent $3/serving and you technically saved more time in the long run and hassle just because you learned to utilize the whole pan instead of a small corner.