In that case, unoptimized lisp for kjvbible.txt at 0.365 is 3rd fastest beating C
I'm also pretty certain the article is benchmarking against the 10x copy file for the actual benchmarks.
See this example command in the article:
time $PROGRAM <kjvbible_x10.txt >/dev/null
So, even if you had the exact same hardware, I'm pretty sure your program would only be a bit faster than the unoptimized C# version. However, it's possible that your machine is a lot slower than what's used in the article, and your program is actually pretty fast -- but without more points of comparison, we just don't know. You haven't run the other benchmark programs on your hardware and posted the results.