When something looks like two simple controls in a small rectangle, and you have to accidentally shuffle your trackpad over it to figure out that it will move to reveal a dozen more controls, that is a failure of design.
When something looks like two simple controls in a small rectangle, and you have to accidentally shuffle your trackpad over it to figure out that it will move to reveal a dozen more controls, that is a failure of design.
Another bad one is Mac's "Do not disturb" option. Good luck finding that.
It would of course be much better to have the previous tweet partially on-screen, possibly under a small gradient.
This is the actual start of the thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1369705219110498304
That kind of thinking is why we can't have nice things.
I want apps that do things for me, not apps are crippled to satisfy some fashionable UX fad-dogma.
Worse is that apparently Medium requires the stupid, and often irrelevant pictures. Apparently some numbskull decided there would be more "engagement" if an article included pictures. So pictures there shall be, regardless of whether they add to the content or not.
They are the photos of procrustes.
What is even worse is that they've started dedicating yet another giant pic for each item/link.
It is a theft of one's time. Normally when I see such design I would leave the site immediately but unfortunately I must actually read some.