Hacker News Reader

Comment by akamaka | Hacker News Reader

> If you do know men like this and you disagree with me, please elaborate.

I think your hypothesis is mostly correct, except for the idea that the men who are having more sex are “tremendous specimens”.

I don’t think they need to be especially attractive or powerful. It could be cultural or psychological differences that make some men put more energy into their pursuits. For example, compare Jimmy Carter to Bill Clinton.

View on HN

You just mentioned two of the most powerful and charismatic men in history. Can you elaborate on the comparison?

Carter is a very pious individual whose actions always seem to be consistent with that belief system.

Clinton is a well-know womanizer whose exploits were known long before his presidency.

They are both powerful, and influential. But one seemed to put a whole lot more effort into getting laid, to the point of destroying his career.

I see. I was misinterpreting the parent comment. The general point here is that Carter could have been Clinton had he desired to, but he did not.

I dont think Bill Clinton can be reasonably considered someone who had "destroyed his career".

They’re both very similar in good looks and success, but one is known as a faithful husband, and the other is a prolific womanizer.

We could perhaps simplify the hypothesis to say that modern dating, enabled by apps, has made it easier for men who have a high desire to sleep with many women to do so.

Ah, I understand. That's an interesting point you make. I am inclined to agree with you. It would have a similar reality-distorting effect; Carter influenced one women, Clinton influenced many.

If you got in front of a room and said “I’m here to talk about one of the most powerful and charismatic men in history: Jimmy Carter.” people would assume you were joking.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com