Hacker News Reader

Comment by dhdc | Hacker News Reader

From my very limited knowledge of physics, time crystals can theoretically oscillate forever without any excitation at their ground state, though laws of theromodynamics are not broken and energy cannot be extracted from their oscillations. In a normal crystal oscillater, power is needed to keep the crystal oscillating.

View on HN

While this may be that they can oscillate forever, measuring it is an act of removing energy from it.

Not necessarily. You can measure things in ways that add energy: e.g. radar waves contribute a tiny bit of energy to the things they bounce off. Yet they measure where objects are.

You can also measure some things in ways that add exactly 0 energy. If some quantum system absorbs exactly nothing of a certain wavelength, that tells you something about the system.

You don’t need to remove energy from an object to measure it.

If you shine a flashlight into a dark room, you are measuring the positions of objects inside, and those objects don’t lose their energy.

you are changing the momentum of the things you are mentioning. the considerations here are on a more quantum scale than furniture in a room.

So could it be said then that it's more efficient? Say, you'd need less energy to measure time with a time crystal than a quartz crystal?

I have no knowledge of them but the article says it oscillates at lower energy levels, almost nil, compared to a quartz crystals. Since it is still unexplored territory there are lots of possible applications.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com