That's not right at all. They both ban adult content and Gab will ban blasphemy. They also frequently remove drug content.
They're stricter on banning speech than Twitter and the sites they fled from.
it's not censorship when you like it!
*) we = right leaning americans
probably correct that they censor based on conservative opinions. not correct that right leaning americans are conservative. all conservatives are right leaning tho. not the other way around.
The "right" was merely copied from an ancestor post.
In most cases, you'd probably be correct in thinking that the person would be more inclined to preserve the status quo than changing it too quickly, for fear of unforeseen consequences.
Also, a simple Google search and 30-second skim of Wikipedia throws a wrench in your assertion.
This does not encompass reactionary conservatives that have become incredibly prominent as a political group in the United States, to the point of completely taking over one of the two political parties.
https://cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-starr/state-dept-offi...
They're not a free speech network, they're just a network where racism is permitted speech and anything they don't like is banned.
...of allowing certain speech.
Because that's, obviously, what “free speech” means.
Blasphemy is different but I haven't seen corroborating evidence of that.
Even if they did ban blasphemy, it would still be less strict on banning speech than Twitter where entire heads of state have been banned for saying words people don't like (or for being from Iran)