I think it definitely stereotypes, but it’s a defense mechanism. I think it’s possible, but too risky to attempt.

It’s a situation where the Times is clearly in the wrong, but this guy is out of a job. Because of the thoroughness of these posts and the references to lawyers, the best case is this guy gets millions after a few years of litigation.

But that’s why the reasonable action is to just avoid the risk. That’s easier than trying to fix teenagers, large orgs, etc