In attempt to sum things up, I'd say that many of the woes of the modern Linux desktop stem from being stuck between different worlds — one example would be with the X11 vs. Wayland situation. Wayland has slowly been improving over time, but there are still concessions that are being made by using either. I understand that transitions are difficult and that particular case is being made more difficult by parties like Nvidia, but the end result is a degraded end-user experience that won't be fixed until the transition is over.
There are also configurations that are better supported by Wayland than X11, not to mention Wayland handles things like trackpad gestures better (which at this point, X11 is never going to get better at), so even if it's not yet production ready there are reasons why some might want to use it.
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/trying-wayland-by-default-aga...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefault
It seems reasonable to expect that these two distro's are the main ones in use by people who don't know enough to pick for themselves.
Have you heard of... asking?
"I downvoted you for lack of details"
FFS.