Its kind of silly to have wireless that is faster than the wired options. One use case is that I want to store larger files on a NAS but I don't want throughput to randomly drop such as during large image backups and restorations to a cloud server.
In the real world, 1G ethernet isn't going to hold back a WiFi 6 router. The only exception might be a multi-radio WiFi 6 AP that is within several feet of WiFi 6 clients on both radios.
feels kinda weird that wifi marketing speek is taken at face value two decades into the bullshitting with theoretical maximum agregates.
[1] tested with multiple client/router devices, in close to ideal circumstances (few feet line of sight between devices, no other devices active on the network)
The advertised speed of your router usually doesn't mean much, as it usually implies the maximum concurrent speed available, rather than how much one device can use.