When I lived there, my costs were basically a 900€ for a rental 120m2 apartment + 300€ for groceries and eating out. Since the start of the pandemic I moved to my own place and now pay 400€ in mortgage.
The biggest challenge I see is the VC sector in continental Europe. While in the US, I see seed rounds of 0.5-1.5 Millions, the last 2 seed deals I've seen in Lisbon were of mere 50K€. A trifle.
The main problem I found was the housing stock is in pretty terrible shape. Flats have basically no insulation and often have bad problems with damp. No insulation means the flats are freezing in winter and you can hear the neighbors do everything.
While eating out is definitely significantly cheaper, many things are (much) more expensive than in London. Supermarkets, home internet, cell service (brutally expensive), utilities (I was paying 10x for utilities in winter compared to London, because of the complete lack of insulation - and Portugal has some of the highest electricity rates in Europe).
Overall I would not suggest moving to Lisbon if you are expecting an overall significantly lower cost of living than London. There are lots of other benefits though :).
I agree thermal isolation is a bigger issue in Portugal though. Because really cold days are not that common, old constructions don't have proper isolation and rely on inneficient heating. In the UK however you have the opposite problem where almost no apartment is ready for warm days. A flat with air conditioning is a rarity. Last summer a friend of mine moved with his kids to a hotel for a week during the heat wave just because of this.
I do agree with you on air conditioning in the UK though, for sure.
I'm in a rental for this month, and I just woke up to this - noise of a baby playing with balls on the floor, above my bedroom.
I am surprised this is still a problem in the 21st century.
Market forces don't work for hidden features like this, so why would it ever change?
This is why people want to live in detached houses - after years of psychological torture from living in cheaply built or badly designed flats.
https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/97007/3...
The cold is really the buildings fault. It's hard to explain it you are used to northern European construction. It seems to be colder inside than out! It's quite a common and well talked about problem.
What is good: weather, people, interesting places to visit 30min-1hr away, food, etc. What you'd expect really.
Ok, go ahead with them?
The thing is, by having a mortgage, you are effectively building equity in a good you can resell later (a house).
Cheap house means you can sell it for cheap and retire where it's cheap. Meanwhile, a property in a hot market where the mortgage is still the same fraction of your income can be resold for much more. Gives you freedom to retire where you want.
If your rent doubles from $1,000 to $2,000, but your salary doubled from $75,000 to $150,000, you incurred $12,000 more in expenses for $50,000 more in after tax income.
Not to challenge the great point you make about CoL, but there's so much cultural distortion around home ownership that it's almost a parody of fundamental economics.
it's only a bubble if it pops.
> there's so much cultural distortion around home ownership that it's almost a parody of fundamental economic
Again, it's only a distortion if it doesn't persist for so long to become a persistent ground truth.
A house is not a house is not a house because location, location, location. You can put the same exact dwelling structure in two different places and they can have two very different values because everything around the house matters too and if those things persist, they become as real as the house.
There's also nothing stopping you investing your excess income in other areas outside property.
HR hates it lul
I don't get this knee-jerk reaction where, if you discuss money, then it immediately must be the only thing you care about. Why can't it just be one element of the equation, along with other usual stuff like weather, food, etc?
We should assume that most of the people that live in Portugal are not stupid or victims. They’re optimizing for something they prefer.
The GP is the one that reduced the choice of living in Portugal to wealth, not me.
The only constant is change, if you can adapt to anything, you're way better prepared than someone who know what they want today and can only have that.
Choosing to optimize for wealth is fine; but foisting that choice on everyone over everything else is silly.
I read your original reply and other replies and I think you're the one conflating the point. Many people prioritize wealth but still enjoy life...like myself. I don't regret anything and am very happy day to day.
I’m not sure how much further I can discuss this? If you’re happy optimizing for wealth, good for you. I’m not sure how that makes anyone short sighted and rigid? Short sighted and rigid for not choosing your optimization? Doesn’t that make you short sighted and rigid? Whatever, do your thing- but please don’t think the people of x country are stupid or whatever because they don’t choose what you do. Come on.
You can make a mathematical transformation to compare Renting with Owning.
O - R + R vs R + X
Own - Rent our your place + Rent somewhere else vs Renting and investing your principal some other way. So reducing you get:
O - R vs X
So owning and renting out a house vs all other investment opportunities, such as Bitcoin. Literally if you rented your house in the last two months and invested the principal into altcoins, you could then own 5 houses!
I signed my wife up with Swapfiets. You rent a bike by the month with them. Basically you fill in a form online, enter your payments card details and they deliver a bike. You then get billed on a monthly subscription until you cancel. All good. Great service until.... we missed a payment because I forgot to move money onto the card in time. No worries I'll just move it across and let them try again.... except... no they don't try again they send emails instead. They sent 4 emails however due to some factors we never paid the bill manually (working full-time at home with a baby and a toddler during a pandemic some less important stuff can slip) so they sent it to the debt collection agency. A few days prior to them sending it to the debt collectors the next months payment became due and was successfully collected. Now if I owe a company x amount of money and then the next month y amount I expect my balance to be x + y and once I pay an amount I expect it to be deducted from the balance and the overdue payment date to be reset. In this case I would expect my due balance to be y. Not with swapfiets, my due balance was x. I raised this with them and they basically told me the system doesn't work like that (no acknowledgement that it should work like that and this is a mistake on their part), they send email reminders and basically fuck you. This sums up European attitudes and companies perfectly. To recap they made the following mistakes:
1: Their UX is broken in that every other subscription I use will try to take payment again before sending a reminder.
2: Their app is not coded according to industry standard billing processes.
3: They refuse to acknowledge any accountability on their side and basically tell me to do one.
This is European startups in a nutshell. We suck at customer service and it shows.
Then you will end up getting a small flat in Sintra, Vila-Franca, Seixal, Cacias, or whatever up to 30 - 60 km from Lisbon and enjoy 1 h commute every single day, both ways.
But you can actually get paid more than that in IT positions, no problem (after-tax salary)
Nowadays the only people I am aware are still getting as much, are senior of my age and older, friends that are self employed, or those that only get half of the salary in official ways (yes undeclared payments are still daily business).
So yeah, while being away for 18 years might not make me have a daily picture, it is not as I don't come regularly back home.
But I'm not disagreeing with you, the salary ceiling is low, I was just noting that it wasn't as low as 1k/1.5k (yeah, 2k/2.5k is more like it, the taxes don't help neither)
While companies continue to base offers they make on your current salary (if you're silly enough to disclose it), accepting a lower salary on the basis of a lower cost of living is going to lower all your future salaries.
While in the US, I see seed rounds of 0.5-1.5 Millions, the last 2 seed deals I've seen in Lisbon were of mere 50K€
Seed rounds don't exist in the US any more. The first raise is effectively a Series A, because startups are expected to bootstrap to revenue now.
Compare that, and living costs don't matter that much.
In 10 years the difference is huge
We need to make a few hires, but sourcing talent is either more time consuming or more expensive (head hunters) than it feels like it should be.
You could try reaching out to devs in those cities, I am sure many would be more than willing to move back home for the right price.
P.S. I don't think them moving to London is such a big risk anymore))
I'd move out there in a heartbeat...although it does help that I have some passable Portuguese comprehension :)
Naturally public sector has the most attractive numbers for years working/minimum age.