“Show me the incentives, I’ll show you the outcome.”
If corrections staff were held personally liable for these failures, or the local jurisdiction faced steep financial penalties, it wouldn’t happen. No liability, no responsibility.
If corrections staff were held personally liable for these failures, or the local jurisdiction faced steep financial penalties, it wouldn’t happen. No liability, no responsibility.
That is spot on, and generalizes well.
"iot vendors make post-sales money if they collect data from their device"
"phone vendors make money if they bundle terrible apps with their phone"
"robocallers make lots of money, with historically no fines paid out for violations"
They wouldn't even know the first thing about how to hire someone capable of doing this. They'd have to hire a consultant to hire another consultant.
In a situation where "computer says 'No!'" but the law says 'Yes', whoever signed off on the purchase/maintannces of that computer should be held as responsible as if they'd made that decision themselves.
There should be a very simple and obvious answer for any of these over-incarcerated inmates to the question "Who, as in which individual person, do I point an ambulance chasing no win no fee lawyer at for a compensation claim?"
I think the general understanding of paper filing systems vs. computer systems is less specialized!