Could you substantiate this? How many international journalist teams were allowed into China?
It just scratches the surface.
I don't see any evidence of that. The current administration is pretty friendly towards China.
(China would lose though. Just block the oil and coal supply routes)
They did lose, eventually.
It shouls also be viewed in it's geopolitical context - China is desparate to have secure land routes into Europe and the middle east incase things kick off in the South China sea, and by their calculations that security requires (forcefully) integrating the Uighur people into Chinese culture and nationalism. On the other hand, the west will take what opportunity they can to attack China on human rights grounds, despite the hypocrisy of all the human rights abuses around the world they happily ignore (the treatment of Kurds in Turkey, for example).
TLDR; we can be critical of western imperialism, while still holding China to account.
Of course this won't work. People prefer the freedom to work on what they want, and they contribute more to GDP when given that freedom.
The CCP will give guided tours of their concentration camps to try to prove they are not concentration camps.
Pulling out prisoners, in jail against their will, who say on camera: "I am here for my own good, I am happy".
It's bizarre and frightening.
Just like they believed during Soviet Union that gulags were enlightened humanitarian institutions full of happy people.
Western Academics loved Stalin, even as millions were dying in the Ukraine because:
1) He was a Communist - and the leader of the glorious revolution.
2) The direct news of 'how bad it was' wasn't clear. We didn't have TV to project images and experiences. And maybe there was a snippet or two in the NYT about it, so it was easy to dismiss, fantasize.
3) We didn't really understand these mass control regimes yet. This was a new phenom. This massive, centralized control for the proletariat, the grand experiment wasn't up yet. Communism wasn't truly a dirt word until after the 1950's and 1960's when it was also associated with the Cold War.
One would expect by the 10th repetition of the same BS playbook in the last 100 years, people would know by now...
I think the Chinese government is totalitarian and aggressive, and the standard of due process and human rights is very different of what we consider acceptable in the "west".
I also wouldnt be surprised if things like widespread facial recognition and other types of intrusive vigilance is present (something very bad),I also would not be surprised if the area has received a large Han migration (something more gray, neutral). I also acknowledge that people that they may consider dangerous (number in the tens of thousands? are or have been detained for longer periods) and that the youth population receive education to become integrated to the Han majority.
Having said that,I have seen 0 actual evidence of genocide, beyond very wild speculations. 0 bodies, mass graves, executions,1-million people in jail etc. If I see the evidence I of course will change my mind.
On the other hand almost every notably speaker of the genocide have had an axis to grind against China. From the crazy newborn Christian Zenz, to the Uyghur woman who worked for the CIA and did a reddit AMA, to yes! people like Pompeo or Trump or even the mainstream western media.We are in the middle of a new cold-war.
Uighurs are exempt of the 2-child policy reserved to the Han, and their population have increased in the region compared to the previous decades.China has also be receptive to receive inspection and FWIW the entire muslim block is with China.You could argue that they are being blackmailed, but some of them are rich enough to not depend now or in the future from China.
Anyway, it is going to be interesting once the proposed French laws against Muslims extremism are in place to see if the same standard will be applied to the reporting. Interesting times these.
That's rather convenient. Wonder if any global powers with a vested interest could take advantage of this mindset...
> China controls flow of information so tightly, that even rumours should be considered credible unless proven otherwise.
You could say exactly the same about the military occupation of every country, or are we getting the whole truth in Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen or Iraq?
For me this a case of simply, "Since I am American/European I will believe my press" Well, I am not Chinese, neither American or European so I dont have that automatic loyalty nor prejudice.
For example, you are saing it here, on English-speaking website located in USA. And you are not scared of possible consequences for you and your family.
I am pretty sure there are many better examples, but this one is here and now, and hard to deny.