Without making any judgement on if this ratio is reasonable: this is 3-5x more than BTC POW but arguably also contains other negative externalities like loss of life, etc.
[1] https://earther.gizmodo.com/groundbreaking-report-gives-us-a...
Without making any judgement on if this ratio is reasonable: this is 3-5x more than BTC POW but arguably also contains other negative externalities like loss of life, etc.
[1] https://earther.gizmodo.com/groundbreaking-report-gives-us-a...
That's something like 5 orders of magnitude more activity with USD vs BTC.
So for something that is used upwards of 100,000x more and only takes 5x more energy, that'd be a win for USD, no?
This of course is all disregarding my strong skepticism that the excesses of the US Military is a reasonable proxy for the strength of the US dollar.
And for that matter, I don't accept the theory; it reeks of motivated reasoning to me.
That's quite an unbelievable leap. The USD infrastructure and it's energy needs is in no way dependent on reserve status. That's just grasping at straws.
The same plumbing handles a plethora of other, smaller currencies with many orders of magnitude better efficiency than BTC does (yeah yeah Lightning, off chain, blah blah).
At least I assume Bitcoin obviates all of those things since I keep seeing them brought up in comparison to Bitcoin's energy usage.