Hacker News Reader

At the time I'm posting this, there are two comments related to the low carbon tech the article is about, the rest are about Chris Sacca and what he did. I for one, don't find much value in the latter, past the initial awareness of his past. Would it be possible to separate the two threads of conversation so one can participate in the thread that is most valuable for them and not waste time with the other?

View on HN

I tend to disagree with this sentiment only because our actions in life have consequences. The SV bro club have/had their issues for obvious reasons & I think its more than fair that entrepreneurs that might be interested in funding from so etc should be aware of such a past.

Harvey Weinsteins's new fund is here to help save the world... Should we not mention his past?

I did not ask for his past not to be mentioned, I asked if it could be discussed in a different thread, as an optimization. It is much easier to join a discussion in anither thread than to filter out comments in an intermingled thread.

Would you send your daughter to Saccas house and not mention his past* because he is an investor?

> his past*

Allegedly "touching someones face" at a private party social event in Las Vegas 12 years ago?

I think that doesn't needs a warning. I also think it shouldn't be equated with a convicted serial rapist (Weinstein).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com