> I’m simply giving Taylor Lorenz the benefit of the doubt.

I suggest you read how she reacted to being exposed.

> I would extend that courtesy to Glenn Greenwald too, had he not exhausted it writing shit like this.

Again, what "shit" are you referring to? Why are you so angry that he's reporting on this issue?

> Anyway, here’s the larger point: it’s absolutely ludicrous to claim that Marc Andreeson’s life and reputation would be ruined even if the allegation were true. That’s why this is such trivial bullshit to write about.

So you give the perpetrator a free pass because their victim in this case happens to be a high-profile person who might be able to defend themselves against the slander and all its consequences?

What hope is left for the little guy?