It took about 10 words to realize this was written by someone holding a short position. This is fine, but Wallstreetbets demands some sort of regulation?
> Initial Disclosure: This report represents our opinion, and we encourage every reader to do their own due diligence. Please see our full disclaimer at the bottom of the report. We have no position (short or long) in Clover Health because we think in this moment for public markets, it is more important for people to understand the role short sellers play in exposing fraud and corporate malfeasance. ...
Because your comment is nonsensical.
First of all, they claim no position in the stock. Even if you don't believe it, they did research on a company, decided the business looks bad. Do you expect them to be long the stock? Do you think they randomly chose this company to "bring down"?
Where are all the people upset about situations where banks like Morgan Stanley, who have Tesla for a client and own huge portions of ARKK (which in turn owns many Tesla shares) put out ridiculous reports claiming Tesla Insurance is more valuable than Geico, Tesla "parts" is bigger than VW and Tesla autonomy is worth billions, in order to juice the stock upward?
The bias is unbelievable.
(Disclosure: I hold puts.)
Your claim that they have a position in this case was incorrect, because you can't be bothered to read what you're commenting on, and that's probably why you're downvoted.