[1] https://siliconangle.com/2013/07/19/how-the-nsa-taps-underse...
[1] https://siliconangle.com/2013/07/19/how-the-nsa-taps-underse...
https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2014/10/new_evidence_of...
If the encryption used is flawed, they could see whatever they want.
They can see who is talking to who, and when:
But Snowden showed us that a lot of it is scooped up and warehoused. Maybe they can see your traffic in a decade or two?
They can't. That's why they call it "bulk collection."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUSCULAR_(surveillance_program...
A lot of surveillance is done both *illegally* and secretly.
Forcing carriers to install black boxes next to their routers is not always the preferred choice.
While a cable is being tapped, there will be a suspicious change in signal strength, and various signal reflections will tell the cable operators where the tap is. Thats bad for a spy agency who want to remain undetected.
Instead, they break the cable in three points deliberately. The middle point is where they put the tap, and the spy agency will repair it. The points either side are simply so that the cable operators don't know where the tap has been inserted, and have to be repaired by the cable operator. That gets expensive, since it will typically happen 3 or 4 times for a new cable install (3 or 4 countries want access to the data).
Cable repair operations are typically public knowledge (they require specialized ships), so anyone who fancies can crunch the data and see how often a cable breaks in multiple places before being repaired to know how often it's tapped... Mediterranean cables seem to see the most taps.
Please don't make guesses. I'm aware of the tapping process.
> Thats bad for a spy agency who want to remain undetected.
Yes, this is inevitable and it's still extremely more stealth that plugging network taps in somebody's else NOC. Especially if the tapping is done illegally.