No, it's not. Freedom of speech never came with a freedom from consequences, nor a guarantee to a broadcast platform. You're still free to stand on the corner with a "God hates fags" sign or a "kill democrats" sign.
Americans arent very forgiving to terrorists and terrorist sympathizers, and that applies to parler members just as well as taliban members
No, it didn’t.
It invaded Afghanistan because al-Qaida was based there and the Taliban was actively protecting them.
> Americans arent very forgiving to terrorists and terrorist sympathizers,
Very clearly true of Islamic terrorists who have targeted the US or Israel. Very much less true of other terrorists, especially racially White ones, and most especially racially White ones that aren’t Communist.
Did everyone on Parler do what they said? No. Did some? Yes, we have captures of their posts and video of them doing it. When people with bad intentions never encounter any push back, they're emboldened and escalate their speech and actions. Parler has been warned for years that allowing this type of content to run rampant will encourage more, and encourage even more extreme statements, which eventually lead to actions. Eventually it happened. And then other independent, private organizations had every right to decide not to do business with them, and proceeded to terminate their relationships with Parler as is their right.
If all the people who peacefully used Parler are upset, they should blame Parler's poor management, as Parler's board clearly did.
The power of twitter is unprecedented. Laws are out of date and it seems folks are hiding behind this fact to justify their own biased beliefs.
Silencing opinion creates extremists.