Your college owns you for 2-3 years after graduation and can hire you out and decide where you live and work and at what rate?
Sounds a lot like indentured servitude.
AND...a large chunk of those folks walk away with unmarketable skills.
AND...you can't declare bankruptcy to get out from under student loans.
...which IMO sounds kinda worse than indentured servitude in that, while you do still have to pay, the mechanism for payment is neither provided in the construct nor is it made possible by the training received.
Basically, sarcasm rarely seems to work on this site, and I am ambivalent about whether this is a good thing.
I went to a state school for 6 years and my total (living + textbooks + food + tuition) cost is nowhere near that number.
I think it'd be 876,000 (36.5K * 6 * 4), but that's beside the point.
Compare that to this case where you basically commit 2 years of time and emerge debt free, and presumably with real work experience.
I’m not advocating for this sort of system, it creeps me out.
What I am saying though, is that college can be a dicey value if you can’t figure out how to translate it to the job market, if that’s your objective.
We would probably be better off if there was a really good system for apprenticeships that was a win win for employers and employees.
Most grads basically have to be mentored for years to be effective, in my experience. It makes it hard on companies looking to hire, because they have to invest so much in someone who can just leave. And hard for the job-seeker, as they are in a difficult position because they may not be able to offer a lot of value, so may not be able to get a job.
For people with top tier degrees, or who are very motivated self starters, none of this matters. But what about everyone else?