Should the government prevent monopolies from having free speech? Because telling google or whoever what or what not they allow in their private platforms is anti free speech.
0r should the government simply prevent monopolies so you have the choice to go somewhere else to consume whatever frothing angry garbage you wish to consume?
You don’t get to have it both ways but both are contrarian to ridiculous libertarian ideals- funny how that works.
Public opinion should change and we should have alternatives; but as long as google and amazon hold monopolies on internet infrastructure option C can’t happen.
We shouldn’t be mad at google policing their own content- we should be mad that theyre the one of the only games in town.
We are simply complaining about google and your sarcastic suggestions were for violating their rights. You're the one who brought it up.
Also; only one of my suggestions was sarcastic.
Then what's your solution? you want govt censorship? they have rights! you should read the constitution.
> The solution isn't to take away these private entities right to free speech
That was never suggested by anyone.
We just want increased public outrage which will encourage (1) competition and/or (2) anti-trust investigations.
> Have you been reading any of my comments?
no.
"Free", but there's the associated cost of upkeep... a barn, it has to be washed, dried, groomed, fed, vaccinated, check-ups, exercised, and lastly, you have to deal with the horseshit... and best part of your expression, is it means you have to deal with both the literal and metaphorical horseshit. :)
Bravo sir or madam.