Your speculation is not interesting to me.
What is interesting to me are actual bugs and vulnerabilities that credible people have found and gotten fixed: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63697-9_...
What is interesting to me are actual bugs and vulnerabilities that credible people have found and gotten fixed: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63697-9_...
e.g. https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-bug-has-camera-activated-...
Where the question arises: was it a bug that the camera was on, or that it was revealed inadvertently? Hence the discussion of trust in the client. That is an instance where Facebook lost some of that trust "in buckets".
It's true that "shit happens", but when it "happens" reptitively the questions begin to emerge. I don't think that's unfair. I mean, I'm sure few people would use a stock Ford Pinto as their regular driver, regardless of Ford's intentions or engineering capabilities.
1) well.. their CEO is a scumbag.
2) not only the CEO is a scumbag, apparently there are plenty more where he came from (scumbagland??)of them in there: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidphelan/2019/02/01/apple-bl...
That second point didn't "just" happen. It was organized. It was planned. It was tested. It was approved. It was rolled out. And I didn't read about 10-50-100 people quitting/getting fired after this fallout. So.. another day at work. This time they got busted. So with CA. So with experimenting on our psychology by manipulating order of showing posts (effectively cancelling out the chronological order).
PS: and right when I thought I would only post positive messages on HN from now one.. a FB post comes up..!! PS2: I guess FB is useful to some. I wish them the best!! (there is a positive note!)
If you think the contrary, then the evidence is in the client.