Leaving aside the strangely bigoted comment about religion, his argument about Rust securing all memory bugs is vapid. As anyone acquainted with high-performance networking code in Rust has seen (remember the Actix fallout?), it's very hard to do a great many things without unsafe Rust. I'd much prefer a deeper discussion about a) how many of these bugs are actually important in practice and b) how a few of them would be solved by idiomatic, safe Rust. This article doesn't do either and doesn't answer the question in its own title.