Hacker News Reader

Comment by mushbino | Hacker News Reader

What he's saying about Parler is easily provable as false:

https://www.abc4.com/news/top-stories/i-have-guns-and-ammo-v...

I used to love Glenn, But I don't know what happened to him after Snowden. He's been an unapologetic hypocritical bootlicker ever since.

View on HN

I'm not seeing the contradiction here. Are you suggesting that Greenwald denied that Parler was used for planning/coordination? Perhaps you missed this paragraph?

> It is true that one can find postings on Parler that explicitly advocate violence or are otherwise grotesque. But that is even more true of Facebook, Google-owned YouTube, and Twitter. And contrary to what many have been led to believe, Parler’s Terms of Service includes a ban on explicit advocacy of violence, and they employ a team of paid, trained moderators who delete such postings. Those deletions do not happen perfectly or instantaneously — which is why one can find postings that violate those rules — but the same is true of every major Silicon Valley platform.

Yesterday he was claiming that no one arrested was an active Parler user, he moves the goal posts https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/13490283841107312...

Yeah Greenwald has transformed into a conspiracy-nut / troll since leaving the Intercept and starting his substack.

Looooong before then.

Would you like to make a substantive criticism or just use ad homonym?

It's ad hominem, and Greenwald has always been incompetent. Just look at his PRISM reporting, which he still hasn't issued a correction for and just never talks about anymore (not a single mention in his pardon rant on Substack) after apparently finally realizing how embarrassingly wrong his reporting was.

What was wrong about his reporting on PRISM?

It was entirely wrong. The slides he published very clearly showed that it was an integration project with the FBI. The companies sent the FBI data for specific accounts under court order, and that is the only data that PRISM ingested. Greenwald thought the NSA could access arbitrary accounts' data. He could easily have gotten this right (like the New York Times did the very next day and CNET and the rest of the tech media shortly after) if he had bothered to figure out what each piece of the diagrams meant or if he had consulted anybody who understood computers at all instead of just a high school dropout SharePoint admin — you know, journalism.

https://images.theconversation.com/files/26668/original/ngww...

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/technology/tech-companies...

https://www.cnet.com/news/no-evidence-of-nsas-direct-access-...

IIRC that was Snowden’s claim too and he worked on it (I don’t have an exact text quote since this is from the Citizenfour doc), and the claim is that the data can be requested as long as the individual is suspected, which can be for something as frivolous as a ML look-alike match on traffic patterns.

Also the key piece of the reporting was on the abuse of the Patriot’s act. Without Greenwald and Snowden the New York Times wouldn’t even touch the topic.

> IIRC that was Snowden’s claim too and he worked on it

Snowden did not work on PRISM, nor did he ever claim to. He had failed a test necessary to even see data collected under Section 702, so he couldn't so much as see the data that PRISM ingested. https://www.vice.com/en/article/mb9mza/exclusive-snowden-tri...

> and the claim is that the data can be requested as long as the individual is suspected, which can be for something as frivolous as a ML look-alike match on traffic patterns.

No. It goes through the normal court order process where the company will push back if it isn't legit. Section 702 court orders can only request data for non-Americans outside the US, and the company that gets the order will have a good idea of whether this is true for a particular account.

> Also the key piece of the reporting was on the abuse of the Patriot’s act.

The only illegal US program that they exposed was phone metadata collection. The pair of illiterates thought that PRISM was something supremely sinister (that anybody with the most rudimentary computing and reading skills can easily figure out it isn't), so they hyped that story a lot. People corrected Greenwald on Twitter on day one, but it took years for him to understand how much he botched that story, and his ego prevented him from issuing a correction. Instead, he just stopped talking about it and now only ever mentions phone metadata. https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-case-for-a-pardon-of-ed...

Where did he move the goal posts? From the article...

>Indeed, a Parler executive told me that of the thirteen people arrested as of Monday for the breach at the Capitol, none appear to be active users of Parler. The Capitol breach was planned far more on Facebook and YouTube

The tweet you linked shows a post on parler dated November 16. That's not evidence the poster was an "active user of Parler". In fact, it suggests the opposite. All we know is he made one post in November.

The "viking guy" who has been talked about probably moreso than any other single rioter is and was active on Parler.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210106213432/https://parler.co...

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-breaking/...

So this claim is trivially falsifiable with even the most minimal journalistic effort.

He's not listed as part of the 13 people charged by the DoJ. It's possible that he was arrested later. But Glenn didn't lie here.

So the parler exec probably looked at this list, checked to see if any one of these people used his platform, and found none did. Then he told Glenn. However, more people have since been charged.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/thirteen-charged-federal-cour...

The entire point was silly to begin with. Why start doing victory laps over the first 13 people? What's so special about them? Nothing.

I think they are some of the more notable characters. That's why they were the first to be identified and then arrested.

Or - Glenn's just trying to be a contrarian again, which has been his shtick for a while now.

This post from 2 weeks ago aged like a corpse.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-authoritarian...

Glenn is absolutely right here. If anything, the article needs an update because of all the authoritarian shit (new patriot act, sending rioters to gitmo, etc) proposed over the last week.

You accused Greenwald of moving the goal posts. You have not demonstrated that.

Edit: congratulations drally you win

"I" did not.

Focusing on the first 13 people arrested the day of the attack instead of the dozens arrested since doesn’t make any sense or help his argument.

I hadnt even heard of it before it was banned. Dismissing one of the few genuine voices on the left because of a misperception is supercilious.

Edit: It looks like Greenwald wasnt even wrong about what he said, people are just accusing him of lying for some reason

https://twitter.com/evanchill/status/1349097133186707457?s=2...

Edit: Has the left accomplished all of its goals? No? Then it needs to figure out what its doing wrong.

I’m not dismissing him because of one mistake, I dismiss him because the only lens he looks at anything through anymore is how the it’s all actually the left or the media’s fault.

What? Glenn has done crucial work against Bolsonaro's corruption in Brazil, so much that he's been charged and persecuted with bogus allegations:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/prosecutor...

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brazil-sergio-moro-corr...

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/glenn-greenwald-charged-...

His family has been threatened and he is constantly targeted by the far right in Brazil. How ignorant and naive you must be to call him a bootlicker?

He's not a "bootlicker". He lost his faith in the US and became (more of) a fan of Russia.

(Parler is run by a CEO who married a politically prominent Russian (not Russian-American) spouse with essentially zero ties to the USA.)

Greenwald a fan of Russia is one of the funniest jokes I have heard lately.

With the state of American politics today, saying "I don't think we have enough evidence to conclusively tie ____ to Russia" is sufficient evidence for a significant chunk of the population to accuse the speaker of being "in the pocket of Russia". Unfortunately.

Ah yes, Greenwald is a big fan of Russia and their progressive gay-friendly agenda.

"Have you know shame Senator McCarthy"

But his main point is that free speech is curtailed unevenly, which isn't false.

You just feel betrayed that he went from criticism government to criticizing corporate, and to calling out the double standards in the culture that protect liberals, and punish conservatives, which as a "tolerant centrist" you should be against.

Instead you call him a gimp while it's your attitude that sounds like unapologetic hypocrisy feverishly licking the boots of whoever you're no longer allowed to criticize... As George Carlin (i think) said, that tells you who's in charge and what they fear. I'm sure they thank you for supporting their cause.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com