I saw a great analogy on Twitter:
Imagine Twitter as the anti-homosexual cake shop and Q-Anon/Trump/Radical Right as the couple who want a cake for their gay wedding.
I think this analogy needs a lot of work.
Specifically, how does banning people for their actions work well as an analogy for banning someone for who they are (and you must take that for granted, because that's the legal frameworks opinions on the matter)?
That's also an even worse example because the supreme court found in favor of the cake shop.