Hacker News Reader

Comment by brobdingnagians | Hacker News Reader

Starting with the title "We need more than deplatforming". First claim is that deplatforming / silencing is great, but we need even more of the same.

"more than just the temporary silencing or permanent removal of bad actors from social media platforms"

And of course, they want to be part of determining who, exactly, is a bad actor.

View on HN

Their market share dwindling to zilch can't come quick enough.

They also claim that The New York Times and news outlets the NYT recommends represent "factual voices" that need to be amplified.

I'm looking for alternatives after 24 years with Mozilla.

I used to worry about their sinking market share. Now I celebrate it (2.66% if mobile browsers are included).

Unfortunately most alternatives are based on Chromium, and Google is of course also not a neutral player.

Still, there are some interesting browsers to be discovered. Opera has some really nice features now (like workspaces and a free VPN), but it's closed source and partially owned by a Chinese company. But it shows that innovation is still possible in the browser space.

I just ended 17 years of FF fidelity. I was already using Brave on mobile and sometimes on desktop. With the bookmark import tool and my password stored on Bitwarden, it takes a couple of minutes to have a comfy browsing environment.

The only issue I see with Brave is Qwant is the default search engine. Qwant is heavily backed up from the French government and answer to censor request very easily, I have more trust in DDG for privacy & censorship.

I just installed Brave for Android, and for me Google was the default. It's very straightforward to change to Startpage or DDG, but much more worrying than the default engine is that it does not seem to be possible to add a custom search engine such as one using Searx! That's an absolute necessity in my opinion.

I don't know if Brave supports it, but I learned a while back that in Firefox you can add "smart bookmarks" (I think that's what they're called) where you put a "%s" in the url and then when you hotlink the bookmark it will substitute any words after the bookmark keyword into the url.

I've used that trick to add custom search keywords for multiple websites that didn't have an "official" Firefox search engine.

You can set DDG in the settings, I'm using DDG on the Android version. It's also easy to choose it on the desktop version.

I know, as I said in my comment. DDG is okay I guess, but why is it not possible to use a truly custom engine? I personally want to use an instance of Searx.

Surely it is possible to configure a custom search engine in Brave. I would be amazed if the list was hard coded.

Apparently it's only possible if the search engine supports "open-search": https://community.brave.com/t/is-it-possible-to-add-a-new-se...

None of the search engines that I want to use seem to support open-search, however.

In Firefox this is not an issue and adding a custom search engine there is trivial.

I went to the Brave website and had a look around Friday evening. I have also been using Firefox since back before it was even called that.

Part of me thinks I should make the switch, and then part of me think that I'd just be indirectly backing Google by switching to Brave.

Anyone have thoughts on that?

I will now try Vivaldi, which is also based off Chromium.

You mean backing Google because of Chromium? It's not my favorite link, but I also don't see how Google benefits? Except perhaps by open source contributions to Chromium that can be reintegrated into Chrome?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com