I dont know. The calculation of kWh checks out to be 100ah x 48v = 4800wh. And for lead acid 200ah x 12v x 2= 4800wh.
What do you suggest or is there something I am thinking incorrectly... space is not an issue BTW.
4 x 12V 200Ah isn't big enough for most houses, unless it's like a cabin in the woods somewhere. and you're right that the cycle life of those and cost is high.
but commercial li-ion based solutions are also expensive. However, if you can keep them at 80-85% state of charge, and rarely if ever discharge them below 30%, they should have lifespans 5-6x longer than the lead acid solution.
in either solution you can't really consider the full volts * Ah capacity of the battery to be usable. If you were to ever use all of the watt-hours in a 12V 200Ah battery you'd kill it, you never want to go below 20% state of charge... so to be conservative the actual capacity of a single battery is something like:
12 * 200 = 2400 Wh, then (2400 * 0.70) = 1680Wh.
This is cheaper than an Apple laptop.
A quarter of the price paid is shipping since it comes directly from China so source price is already under $100/kWh.
A recent test by Will Prowse:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U4ZfQ_IToI
$433 280Ah LiFePO4 Cells Tested: Cheaper than lead acid!
Many people have the same good experience with these kind of cells:
Added: 14 kWh will run a 20 Watt laptop for a month.
My partner and I live aboard a 41ft sailboat and both work remotely as programmers. I installed 1920w of solar on the boat and get approximately 3.5-4.5kwh per day in output, depending on which way we are oriented while at anchor. I installed 600ah of LiFePO4 batteries @ 12v and when combined with that amount of solar, we have pretty much all the power we need. We frequently cook with an air fryer and have a dishwasher on the boat that we run daily-- all off solar.
I chose one (after sending a few private message to forum members) but I'm not recommanding it until I get and test my batteries.
But LFP batteries have gotten really cheap, so the price for a mistake is no longer prohibitive.
It further appears that my statement "high efficiency panels are typically semi-flexible without the frame" is inaccurate- they are typically not reasonably described as semi-flexible, even without the frame and coating.
Monocrystalline by definition is not flexible, you're referring to thin films (cadmium telluride or amorphous silicon or other)
Is there any middle ground?
Is Sunpower's claim of 22-25% efficient monocrystalline semi-flexible panels not to be believed? Have I been fooled by the marketing? Are these thin film panels? Nothing I can find online suggests this is a dubious claim, but it's possible I'm simply failing to find correct information.