This is how you become irrelevant as an activist organisation, what sane person would donate to them now?
This is how you become irrelevant as an activist organisation, what sane person would donate to them now?
Rational people can see this surreal juvenile drama..this theatre..for what it is..and they are also watching and noticing the cognitive dissonance that has gripped our country.
After Jan 20, the real damage would be the aftermath of tech industry’s blitzkrieg. There is a silent majority that is watching and wondering. And shaking our heads.
My fear is darker. Are they acting on their own/in tandem or are they acting upon orders? If so, from who?
These are not irrational people. These are the best run corporate behemoths and such decisions are not made by one person. And it’s too swift to be made via consensus or analysis. None of this makes sense.
There are going to be questions after the dust settles.
I am not sure that you are in silent majority. Most people agree that Twitter should have banned Trump long time ago and are relieved that they finally did that. Since the majority do believe Trump incites violence, Twitter and Facebook etc. felt okay going ahead with banning him.
I still haven't heard a rational argument against banning Trump on Twitter. All free speech bullshit, which has been explained (why it is nonsense) for many years.
You said it. You are not sure.
Look. I speak for myself. And people I know. And the majority of people in MY circle are silent and confused and scratching our heads.
There is literally no evidence that ‘most people agree that Twitter should have banned Trump long time ago’. Are you speaking for ‘most people you know’ or ‘most people in the world’?
I am going to assume it’s the former. Point taken. Thanks for engaging.