That's not the fault of a 'dangerous' claim, that's the fault of people who go heads first into something without taking 20 minutes to understand what they are doing or 20 minutes to profile after.
That's not the fault of a 'dangerous' claim, that's the fault of people who go heads first into something without taking 20 minutes to understand what they are doing or 20 minutes to profile after.
The only thing you could do in that timespan is reading a single summary on the topic and hope that this includes all relevant information. Which is unlikely and the reason why things are often mistakenly taken out of context.
And as the original comment mentioned: they did benchmark and it showed an improvement. They just didn't stresstest it, but that's unlikely doable within 20 minutes either.
In another 20 minutes you can compile and run a medium sized program.
Neither of those is enough time for someone to go deep into something, but you can look up the brand new thing you're using and see where your bottlenecks are.