"basically" is doing a lot of work in your argument.
No one is compelled by this. It is clear that they are two completely separate events. One was dangerous. The other was not.
Again, I'll say it directly to avoid confusion. You are arguing in bad faith.
the left portends to have authoritative insight over the intent of others... based only on their biased perception or desire. And that is precisely the problem.
You just did it to me.
The media does it depending on whether they want "mostly peaceful protests march" or "attempted violent coup."
There is no honest way to suggest that the events of this week are comparable to the events surrounding the protesting of appointments.
I will note however, that you're subtly changing the topic when you change your argument from the protests about the appointment of a judge to the "mostly peaceful protests".
Again, this is bad faith. You are just moving the goal posts to try and suite your argument.
Edit: I conflated the womens march with the protest about the appointment of scotus judge.