Did you look at the paper? Is the data wrong? The calculations? Is there anything you can re-run with alternative data sources that you do trust? Or calculations you checked? Or do you "straight up" not trust people when the conclusion is not controversial enough (or some other random justification) without actually checking anything? At the very least, do you have any sort of data or analysis that backs up the claim that it's more likely than not that this will turn out to be faked data in 6 months, e.g. did a majority of climate-change-is-real papers go down that fate?