Do you think that the remedy to a legal disagreement on balance of power between local/state/judicial should be to throw out thousands and thousands of legitimate votes? Or are you saying those votes are fradulent?
They said they would have taken the case but, even if they found pa to be wrong, they would not give the resolution asked for. That's eminently reasonable to me. This ensures that if they ruledagainst pa, then what happened there won't happen again while ensuring that thousands who voted in good faith are not disenfranchised