"Girls are trailing boys in engineering jobs: why?"
implicitly identifying that as a problem which needed to be fixed.
"Girls are trailing boys in engineering jobs: why?"
implicitly identifying that as a problem which needed to be fixed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37254851
Not really sure what you're implying
On a forum which is organised around engineering.
And people will claim that the latter gets more attention, despite being shown evidence to the contrary. That's pretty average sexism.
(I also would note that this hasn't been up for long enough for people to be up-voting for the content, given that you can only access it as a 23-minute podcast.)
Except this has not been demonstrated at all. The BBC has both covered the topic and it has been discussed in highly upvoted posts on Hacker News.
Based on the search results and point scores, I'd wager that no article with "women" and "engineering" has ever been at the top of the front page, as this presently is.
It does seem like this post is growing more quickly than these did, but perhaps because this is a more surprising/novel development, whereas the gap of women in engineering roles is much more commonly known?
There are also 4 such articles with more points referencing boys and education (not including this one).
Because the headline you gave seems pretty close to what is in fact reported all the time.