I won't put $100k against this, but I'll put $10k against it, because "the truth" is worth it. I'll pool $10k into a $100k stake behind a debate team that can debate this (and validate that this is actually refutable). This is valid until 2021-03-01.
If someone organizes something credible I'd also be in for 10k.
However, I suspect root claim wouldn't go through with it but would just update their model to incorporate more information. They hint at that possibility on their site.
That's the simplest explanation at least. This rootclaim.com process is new to me, there could certainly be other explanations.
Kudos to purplecats for making that offer as well, assuming this whole thing is on the up and up.
edit: below was my post when it was first upvoted, prior to edit.
> Not gp, but to me it seems smart and common to put an expiration date on financial offers.
> Kudos to purplecats for making that offer as well.
And all contractual obligations including thing like NDAs. Maybe it's a number of years, but never enter one for a lifetime. Ever.
The comment you've replied to is a counterexample to this claim.
For example, the meaning of the word "ambiguous" is not ambiguous. If somebody were to ask what the word meant because they did not know the definition, it wouldn't make the word's meaning ambiguous. It would make that person uninformed.
"Looking for an unambiguous calendar-and-clock format that is internationally understood? It’s time for ISO 8601."
"ISO 8601 tackles this uncertainty by setting out an internationally agreed way to represent dates:
YYYY-MM-DD
For example, September 27, 2012 is represented as 2012-09-27."