In what way? It seems a bit like stone throwing to immediately toss another company into the conversation without providing some anecdote.
In what way? It seems a bit like stone throwing to immediately toss another company into the conversation without providing some anecdote.
Even if that's true, which I'm not persuaded of, Amazon's enormous market power makes a big difference. As a consumer, I don't want Amazon to "optimize revenue streams" when that reduces the reward to market participants to be innovative and deliver high quality.
You left something out, "as long as it doesn't effect me (yet), and large companies do it, it must be morally acceptable." I don't know why we defend them. Without Google we still go on. Without us, or support for their practices, they dramatically change or they disappear.
Why did your comment single out Amazon and not the practice of 'immorally' tracking customers?