Really the biggest problem is they aren't cheap, costing more than the drone themselves.
The propellers would not be spinning, and the object would be gently gliding down.
The GP dismissal of the danger of the propellors sounded suspiciously like the guy on YT who just got fined $182k by the FAA, who argued that the first offense for hitting someone in the head should be a $20 fine.
Regardless of whether the blades are locked or spinning at lower RPMs, still better than powered drones falling from the sky!
I don't know what, if any, approaches are implemented but one solution is that you can design a safety feature in the motor control to turn off the motor if it detects blockage.