Even if one were to take the lucrative salary at an ad-tech or fin-tech company, and then invest that in "effective altruism", you'd likely never offset the net harm, even if you contributed 100% of your salary.
It’s funny because it’s really a justification to be selfish, the carbon offset of bad ethics.
What percentage of the jobs in this world fall in the “impact on the world” category ?
impact aside there are some jobs that i'll be better at and will enjoy more.
I think the best critique of the article’s thesis somebody else mentioned which is just because one studies sociology doesn’t mean they can’t later go on to be a dentist.
As well as the “this is a lot to ask of a 17yo” :)
Edit: had I been born 100 years ago I would have had a different line of work