You're missing the point. The crimes and the research are unrelated.
The fact that you consider this some kind of apologia for Nowak demonstrates that you are either unable or unwilling to understand. If Nowak tells you 2+2=4, are you going to say "No that must not be right, because you hung out with Epstein"?
Given his complicity in Mr. Epstein's heinous crimes against humanity, Mr. Nowak now needs to start following a little of his own advice: donate all future research results to the world "anonymously" to avoid forcing victims of sexual assault to have to relive their traumas from the mere mention of this child rapist enabler's name or the sight of his lying face.
Is that clearer now?
Worked pretty well in the case of Epstein, didn't it?
That's why some of us are not going to shut up when it comes to holding Mr. Epstein's "enablers" accountable this time around, got it?
Honestly, I had never heard of who Nowak was, and I probably never would have if you hadn't brought it up. If your goal is to relegate him to obscurity, you're doing the opposite.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2020/5/2/epstein-review-n...
Axios is a reliable source for updates:
https://www.axios.com/jeffrey-epstein-mit-billionaire-favors...